Miller v. Alabama
…for juvenile homicide offenders. Dissenting Opinion (Thomas): The majority relies on Roper and Graham to reach its conclusion. Those precedents and the majority’s own sense of morality, however, do not…
Read moreThe Law Dictionary for Everyone
…for juvenile homicide offenders. Dissenting Opinion (Thomas): The majority relies on Roper and Graham to reach its conclusion. Those precedents and the majority’s own sense of morality, however, do not…
Read more…from voting. Harper initially brought her suit before the U.S. District Court on October 21, 1964, but this initial case was dismissed, the court citing the 1930s precedents that had…
Read more…Gideon’s favor. Said the Court, in its Decision: “Not only [prior] precedents, but also reason and reflection, require us to recognize that, in our adversary system of criminal justice, any…
Read more…of the States. This Court’s precedents have referred to basic principles of federalism in the Constitution to resolve ambiguity in federal statutes. Here, the ambiguity in the statute derives from…
Read more…three principles that arise from the Court’s precedents are (i) free speech cases do not call upon the Court to be legislators, (ii) the “clear and present danger” test includes…
Read more…juvenile to be transferred to adult court for a serious crime before any trial is initiated. Significance: Breed v. Jones is significant because, similar to other Court precedents in the…
Read more