Mitigating Circumstances

Mitigating circumstances are facts that do not excuse a person for civil or criminal misconduct, but which may show that he had some valid reasons for his actions. Mitigating circumstances are often used in court proceedings when the judge or jury determines a defendant’s sentence for a crime, or damages in a civil lawsuit. To explore this concept, consider the […]

Read more

Et Seq.

The phrase et seq. is an abbreviation of the Latin “et sequentes,” or “et sequential,” which mean “and the following.” In written documents, et seq. is used to reference specific pages, sections, or list numbers within statutes, articles, regulations, or other works, to indicate that the information is continued in the sections, or on the pages, which immediately follow. To […]

Read more

Dictum

The Latin term dictum refers to a statement or observation, made by an authoritative source, which does not directly speak to the facts, or affect the outcome, of a legal case. An example of this may include the discussion of a legal principal for the purpose of illustrating, suggesting, or creating an analogy to explain a court’s decision. A dictum […]

Read more

Circumstantial Evidence

Circumstantial evidence is any evidence that requires some reasoning or inference in order to prove a fact. This type of evidence is sometimes referred to as “indirect evidence,” and it may have more than one explanation or lead to more than one conclusion. In many situations, more than one piece of circumstantial evidence may be used to draw the judge […]

Read more

Arguendo

The Latin term arguendo is a legal term that means “for the sake of argument.” When arguing a point in court, or in an academic setting, using the phrase “assuming, arguendo, that …” allows the individual to examine certain conclusions based on disputed facts, without making an admission that those facts are true. This might occur, for example, when an […]

Read more
1 20 21 22 23